![]() This short-sightedness has, more than likely, doomed them in the long-term, as they have no unitary political structure with which to fight the digestion of their gains. The workers, in fact, traded the supremacy of this bureaucratic layer for even more short-term benefits, due in part to the reality that the labor aristocracy had outgrown its political representation, and with such a “gracious” ruling class, the direct leadership of bureaucratic structures seemed to hamper, rather than expand their own sovereign interests. That is not to say they have become irrelevant, but certainly their political leadership of the now organic labor aristocracy has reached an impressive low. Quote: Yet the labor bureaucracy was not immortal, and we in the united $tates have seen a great decline in both union membership and in the excessive privilege of this bureaucratic layer. no different than the liberal nytimes writer seeing a trump guy driving around in an f-150 that's never touched dirt and saying "aha, the working class" It's just a vulgar form of workerism that treats cultural signifiers as evidence of class positions. I think it comes from seeing the primary contradiction as being between the left and its leadership ![]() You can find a throughline from trotskyist "workers qua workers" philosophy -> larouchism Before we move on I wanna point out it’s one thing not reading settlers, another thing entirely calling this future nazi a loving Marxist Leninist when he’s strasserist Ben Shapiro at best ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |